the means to obtain it and ignoring the way Providence works in the conversion of souls. – the imminent end of the world.

Be notified each time a new post appears on our blog! It won’t.

We refuse on the other hand, and have always refused, to follow the Rome of Neo- Modernist and Neo-Protestant tendencies, which became clearly manifest during the Second Vatican Council, and after the Council, in all the reforms which issued from it…” 2. Hier können Sie uns Feedback zu dem Artikel geben: Feedback: E-Mail: Ich stimme zu, dass meine Angaben aus dem Kontaktformular zur Beantwortung meiner Anfrage erhoben und verarbeitet werden.

de Cacqueray. Who cannot see that you fail to do what St. Thomas teaches?

That decision was taken at the end of May.

They are expecting a miracle while at the same time refusing the means to obtain it and ignoring the way Providence works in the conversion of souls.

Have you ever read St. Thomas in his Summa? These priests have now, on their own initiative, started a resistance group in the USA contrary to all their promises of obedience to God and to the Society of St Pius X (made in front of the Blessed Sacrament). Response to a letter of Fr Chazal by Fr François Laisney. Archbishop Lefebvre speaks of “neo-Modernist and neo-Protestant tendencies”, he does not speak of “a new Church”; this is your vicious way to make someone say what he does not say! the abusive exercise of it. 65/ 6459 0792 Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator. Blog Note: The following is a response of Fr. People Projects Discussions Surnames Fr. Rifan made a deal without consulting Bishop Fellay beforehand. The reasons

Laisney to Fr. Moreover, I would refer you to my article on “Various Churches?” Beware of your thinking about the “conciliar church”: if you think it is a separate structure from the Catholic Church, then you are mistaken, nor was this Archbishop Lefebvre’s thinking, and so is very dangerous. Welcome toCrusaders of the Immaculate Heart, © 2020   Created by Dawn Marie. It will not. You are the ones who accuse Bishop Fellay of being a liberal; you are the ones who should prove it! I've read the Privacy Policy and accept the Terms and Condition. {{collectionsDisplayName(searchView.appliedFilters)}}, 'Nur zur redaktionellen Verwendung' ausschließen, {{searchText.groupByEventToggleImages()}}, {{searchText.groupByEventToggleEvents()}}.
No!” Really, you have not read St. Augustine, nor St. Cyprian!


What sin was asked from you?

The only place I can find is my quoting the passage of Archbishop Lefebvre’s declaration of 21st Nov. 1974: On the contrary we refuse and have always refused to follow the Rome of neo Modernist and neo Protestant tendencies, such as were clearly manifested during the Second Vatican Council, and after the Council in all the resulting reforms. These priests have now, on their own initiative, started a resistance group in the USA 3:12).

But he waited until 1988.

Why then did you disobey? sermon of Fr.

Aldo Maria Valli sits down with ++Zen during visit to Rome, where he hoped to speak with @Pontifex. The Archbishop was not a rebel; his first stance was not ‘against’ novelties but rather ‘for’ fidelity. As an apostolate of the Catholic press, we have the mission of spreading the Catholic Faith through the printed word by our Traditional Catholic books and magazine publications. Your place is to repent and return to where you should have gone: under Fr. The real issue is therefore not a doctrinal one but one of simple obedience.

By the way, comparing a canonical regularisation to “getting our papers in order”, as if it were mere paperwork, is to miss the essential spiritual point of “ecclesiastical communion”, that third element in the unity of the Church according to St. Robert Bellarmine, without which no one can be saved: so it is not a question of paperwork. I wonder whether you re-read yourself.

1 Comment.