Newer 43mm non-LEICA filters have a coarser 0.75mm pitch. These are all chrome, except for a special-order 11 113 black version offered in 1962. Lesser brands, like B+W, use larger rings and cannot be used at the same time as any LEICA hood. I prefer the continuous ribbing of newer versions. google_ad_format = "120x600_as"; In brighter light you're stopped down where it's always the sharpest. Get the SUMMILUX if you absolutely, positively need f/1.4, otherwise, choose the SUMMICRON f/2. This SUMMILUX 50mm f/1.4 is the finest 50/1.4 that was available on this planet at any price from 1961 through 2004. This LEICA 50/1.4 has less distortion than any of Nikon's various 50mm f/1.4 lenses made from 1950-2008 and Canon's 50mm f/1.4, and the SUMMILUX has only a fraction the distortion of Nikon's newest (2008) 50mm f/1.4 AF-S. For B&W outdoors, you want a yellow filter standard, like the B+W 46mm #022. If something gets stiff, don't force it. Half stop clicks from 2 048 701 (1964) onwards, 1 stop clicks earlier. They stay a little busy. 1959-1968: 12 521 G (XOOIM), trumpet style, chrome. It's great people like you who allow me to keep adding to this site full-time. Either hood works on any E43 lens (1959-1991). So how sharp is this professional 1961 SUMMILUX design compared to the latest and greatest lenses from consumer manufacturers? If you use this hood, and regular Nikon or Canon 62mm caps fits in the front of the hood, saving you from having to reverse it every time. If you had the good sense to buy one in 1962 for about $199, today it would be worth nearly ten times what you paid for it, and you would have almost fifty years of great photos to show for it. The difference is that the newer, reverse-conical, all-black vented hood cleverly does not block the finder, while the older non-vented, trumpet-style hood does. There is no visible falloff for regular photography, even at f/1.4. It's reasonably flat at infinity. Worse, at f/1.4 they become ovals towards the sides of images. Actually selling prices were probably lower by about 10%. I'd suggest using the newer 12 586 hood on all E43 50mm f/1.4 SUMMILUX, regardless of vintage. enlarge.
It takes 46mm filters and has a built-in telescoping hood. google_color_bg = "FFFFFF"; You can get them at this link to them at eBay (see How to Win at eBay), you also can get them from Adorama. If you do, you could destroy both your SUMMILUX and your accessory. The field of best focus at close distances is actually a bowl that curves to get closer to you as you get farther away from the enter.
Even today, its performance continues to exceed the newest 50mm f/1.4 lenses from Nikon and Canon. Your biggest block to sharpness will be you and your camera's ability to focus accurately. At smaller apertures, diffraction is the limitation. The SUMMILUX doesn't have the usual contrast-lowering veiling or haloing of the Japanese 50mm f/1.4 lenses cause by spherical aberration. Let me show them below. In 1976 it was described as a normal lens with very large maximum aperture with excellent correction for coma, as well as outstanding contrast rendering with freedom from ghost images from bright light sources, even at its full aperture of f/1.4.
Rear, LEICA 50mm f/1.4 SUMMILUX.
The actual focal length is about 51.4mm. 14 007 (438.668-001-170) was available. This LEICA SUMMILUX 50mm f/1.4 was LEICA's standard ultrahigh-speed normal lens from 1961 until it was replaced by the LEICA SUMMILUX-M 50mm f/1.4 ASPH in 2004. This is the first cosmetic version of the SUMMILUX 50/1.4 discussed here. If you wish to make a printout for personal use, you are granted one-time permission only if you PayPal me $5.00 per printout or part thereof.
1992-2004: 0.7m, which is a reproduction ratio of 1:11.6 covering a field of about 277 x 416 mm. 45mm (A45) diameter slip-on filter mount. SUMMILUX (1961-2004) Thanks! I expect that they should be much worse than an older version used with the 12 586 hood. This black ASPH version takes 46mm filters, weighs 335g and has a built-in hood., while the silver verison weighs 460g. 0, Stadio: In these examples, a vertically polarized phase lattice was set up at 3 meters (10 feet) on which the SUMMILUX was focused, while synthetic reference vegetation seen out of focus in the background was at 15 meters (50 feet). 11.6oz (325g) specified. This said, real photographers don't worry about every last pixel of sharpness, and for all real photography, this classic SUMMILUX is as good as anything. 2004 - today: 11 891 (black), 11 892 (silver). Home Donate New Search Gallery Reviews How-To Books Links Workshops About Contact. "14," or 51.4mm, is the most common, followed by "13," or 51.3mm, and then "16," or 51.6mm.
I see different LEICA catalogs list some lenses as 0.75mm, and others as 0.5mm. RC Lens en bref : cette page donne un rapide aperçu de la saison Statistiques générales pour la saison actuelle du club. I support my growing family through this website, as crazy as it might seem. For real photographers, the benefits of the f/2 lenses are smaller size and weight.
They just barely come up to the lower right tip of the 50mm frame when focused to 1 meter. enlarge. Lille Olympique Sporting Club (French pronunciation: [lil ɔlɛ̃pik spɔːʳtɪŋ klœb]), commonly called LOSC, also referred to as LOSC Lille, Lille OSC or simply Lille, is a French professional association football club based in Lille in Hauts-de-France.The club was founded in 1944 as a result of a merger and plays in Ligue 1, the first division of French football. The SUMMILUX is always sharp in the center.
6 30,0 %, Nazionali:
The performance of this SUMMILUX is worlds better than Nikon's 5cm f/1.4. It takes a new black, vented 12 586 hood.
In the region of least sharpness (15mm radius from the center of the image), it gets better as stopped down, and is optimum from about f/4 ~ f/8. All rights reserved. 20, Età media: This is great if you're covered in Vaseline and need grip, but I never have that problem, so I prefer focus rings with continuous ribbing that may be grabbed anywhere comfortably. LEICA's data (see pages 42-45, and specifically page 51 for performance graphs.).
Its cosmetics may have changed, but not its optics or compatibility.
It takes 46mm filters and has a built-in telescoping hood. google_color_bg = "FFFFFF"; You can get them at this link to them at eBay (see How to Win at eBay), you also can get them from Adorama. If you do, you could destroy both your SUMMILUX and your accessory. The field of best focus at close distances is actually a bowl that curves to get closer to you as you get farther away from the enter.
Even today, its performance continues to exceed the newest 50mm f/1.4 lenses from Nikon and Canon. Your biggest block to sharpness will be you and your camera's ability to focus accurately. At smaller apertures, diffraction is the limitation. The SUMMILUX doesn't have the usual contrast-lowering veiling or haloing of the Japanese 50mm f/1.4 lenses cause by spherical aberration. Let me show them below. In 1976 it was described as a normal lens with very large maximum aperture with excellent correction for coma, as well as outstanding contrast rendering with freedom from ghost images from bright light sources, even at its full aperture of f/1.4.
Rear, LEICA 50mm f/1.4 SUMMILUX.
The actual focal length is about 51.4mm. 14 007 (438.668-001-170) was available. This LEICA SUMMILUX 50mm f/1.4 was LEICA's standard ultrahigh-speed normal lens from 1961 until it was replaced by the LEICA SUMMILUX-M 50mm f/1.4 ASPH in 2004. This is the first cosmetic version of the SUMMILUX 50/1.4 discussed here. If you wish to make a printout for personal use, you are granted one-time permission only if you PayPal me $5.00 per printout or part thereof.
1992-2004: 0.7m, which is a reproduction ratio of 1:11.6 covering a field of about 277 x 416 mm. 45mm (A45) diameter slip-on filter mount. SUMMILUX (1961-2004) Thanks! I expect that they should be much worse than an older version used with the 12 586 hood. This black ASPH version takes 46mm filters, weighs 335g and has a built-in hood., while the silver verison weighs 460g. 0, Stadio: In these examples, a vertically polarized phase lattice was set up at 3 meters (10 feet) on which the SUMMILUX was focused, while synthetic reference vegetation seen out of focus in the background was at 15 meters (50 feet). 11.6oz (325g) specified. This said, real photographers don't worry about every last pixel of sharpness, and for all real photography, this classic SUMMILUX is as good as anything. 2004 - today: 11 891 (black), 11 892 (silver). Home Donate New Search Gallery Reviews How-To Books Links Workshops About Contact. "14," or 51.4mm, is the most common, followed by "13," or 51.3mm, and then "16," or 51.6mm.
I see different LEICA catalogs list some lenses as 0.75mm, and others as 0.5mm. RC Lens en bref : cette page donne un rapide aperçu de la saison Statistiques générales pour la saison actuelle du club. I support my growing family through this website, as crazy as it might seem. For real photographers, the benefits of the f/2 lenses are smaller size and weight.
They just barely come up to the lower right tip of the 50mm frame when focused to 1 meter. enlarge. Lille Olympique Sporting Club (French pronunciation: [lil ɔlɛ̃pik spɔːʳtɪŋ klœb]), commonly called LOSC, also referred to as LOSC Lille, Lille OSC or simply Lille, is a French professional association football club based in Lille in Hauts-de-France.The club was founded in 1944 as a result of a merger and plays in Ligue 1, the first division of French football. The SUMMILUX is always sharp in the center.
6 30,0 %, Nazionali:
The performance of this SUMMILUX is worlds better than Nikon's 5cm f/1.4. It takes a new black, vented 12 586 hood.
In the region of least sharpness (15mm radius from the center of the image), it gets better as stopped down, and is optimum from about f/4 ~ f/8. All rights reserved. 20, Età media: This is great if you're covered in Vaseline and need grip, but I never have that problem, so I prefer focus rings with continuous ribbing that may be grabbed anywhere comfortably. LEICA's data (see pages 42-45, and specifically page 51 for performance graphs.).
Its cosmetics may have changed, but not its optics or compatibility.